PLANS for 43 houses on land to the west of The Square in Liphook have been given the green light, despite concerns that the development will be contrary to East Hampshire District CouncilÕs affordable housing policy.

At last ThursdayÕs meeting of the south planning sub-committee, local members Richard Hope, Anna James and Sam James said they were happy with the amended plans for the development.

At the previous meeting developer Westbury Homes was told by councillors to come up with improved designs for the scheme.

After discussions involving EHDC planning officer Jeremy Heppell, local members and representatives of the developer, amended plans were submitted addressing many of the councilÕs objections.

Councillors were told that they could either opt for a development with 10 affordable homes, or eight and a financial contribution to a new classroom for Liphook Infant School.

Mr Hope said the contribution to the school would make sure that a Òsustainable communityÓ is built in the village to match the growth in population.

But spokesman for housing John Venning said the council should be aware that the affordable housing allocation within the site does not meet the councilÕs requirements of 12 or 13 units.

EHDC normally seeks 30 per cent of large developments to be affordable housing where local need is proven.

Mr Venning said: ÒWe have a policy which requires developers to provide 30 per cent of units on a site to be set for affordable housing.

ÒThe only time we do not go by this rule is when there is not a clear need for this type of housing. But Mr HeppellÕs numbers indicate clearly that there is a housing need in Liphook.Ó

Sam James told councillors that the need for affordable homes in Liphook is less now, as 75 have been built in the last few years and another 20 are in the pipeline.

Teresa Jamieson pointed out that allowing less affordable homes on the site may encourage other developers to bargain with the district council.

Mr Heppell said every application is subject to negotiation in terms of affordable housing.

He said: ÒI donÕt think this would set a negative precedent. I donÕt like developers getting away with anything where we can strike a harder bargain.Ó