There was a sense of despair at the latest meeting of the North West Farnham Residents' Association, as members discussed the recent decision by planning inspectors to approve Gleeson Homes' proposal to build 83 houses on land north of Abbey View.

The decision, which overturned local objections, sparked frustration and concern among residents. In attendance to address questions were Farnham Town Cllr David Beaman and Surrey County Cllr Andy McLeod, who fielded queries on a range of topics including local government reform, the Brightwells Yard development, and the future of the Woolmead site.

Trevor Free, a local resident, summed up the community’s frustration:“Waverley has failed us miserably after more than 200 objections, protests outside of Waverley Borough Council, and 11 of 13 planning councillors voting against the development, but the planning authority has decided to grant the development on appeal with conditions.”

Town councillors Cllr Graham White and Cllr George Hesse were scheduled to attend but were delayed due to an extended Farnham Town Council meeting.

Residents expressed serious concerns about the implications of the new development, particularly in relation to traffic, water infrastructure, and the erosion of local amenities. Despite the setback, attendees were resolute in their determination to continue opposing the plan.

The meeting opened with residents highlighting ongoing issues with low water pressure in the area. Many felt let down once again, noting that this marks the fourth time the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan—endorsed by a public vote—has been ignored.

A key point of contention is the proposed Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG), intended to offset development near the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA). Residents argued the designated SANG, located four miles away in Church Crookham, is not viable.

“SANGs are meant to serve as accessible alternatives to protected sites,” one resident noted. “The Church Crookham site is too far away to be used regularly by new residents, which defeats the purpose and could endanger the SPA.”

Despite 200 formal objections, public protests, and 11 out of 13 Waverley Borough Council planning committee members voting against the proposal, the plan was approved on appeal, leaving residents and councillors with limited options.

The group now faces a difficult decision—whether to contest the ruling in the High Court or accept the outcome. Regardless, residents made it clear they are not giving up the fight.